Title: Chemical Plant Security Guards and Background Checks

Hits
221

A recent article in the Columbus, Georgia Ledger Enquirer newspaper (http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/251/v-print/story/47159.html) has some important implications for chemical plants that fall under the new regulations for protecting chemical plants against terrorist attack. This is an AP article that claims that private security guards in Georgia are not getting the background checks required under Georgia law. It seems that the 2,600 armed guards in Georgia get their FBI fingerprint background check because they are state licensed and that check is done as part of the licensing process. The 50,000+ unarmed guards are not licensed and are only required to under go a local records check. Furthermore, the state does not keep records on the unlicensed guards so has no way of knowing if even the local records checks are being done.

The new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulations (6 CFR part 27) that go into effect on June 8th require that high-risk chemical facilities conduct background checks for all personnel that have unaccompanied access to sensitive areas of the facilities. These checks include criminal background checks and checks against terrorist watch lists. While chemical companies will be responsible for checking on their own employees, most guards at these facilities work for contract guard companies. These guard companies are going to have to get these checks done on their employees.

Some people will argue that gate guards do not have unaccompanied access to 'sensitive' areas. The DHS regulations address this by requiring perimeter security and site access to be specifically included as sensitive areas in the Security Vulnerability Assessment and include them in the required risk based performance criteria for the Site Security Plan. Furthermore, most gate guards have patrol requirements when plant personnel are not on site.

The DHS regulations do not spell out what items uncovered in the background checks would prohibit people from working in sensitive areas of chemical facilities. In fact the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has cleared drivers with past drug convictions to haul hazardous chemicals. While terrorist connections, membership in violent groups, and convictions for violent crimes would certainly make someone unsuitable for work in such areas, people with lesser felonies and misdemeanors are not automatically prohibited. Unfortunately for the guard companies, they will not be the ones required to make those decisions, it will be the chemical facility's responsibility.

This brings up privacy issues. If there are minor issues in a guard's background, how much data does the guard company have to share with the facility management? Are they going to have to get the guard's permission to share this information? Will it be sufficient for the guard company to certify to the chemical facility that the background check has been made and there are no findings, or will they have to show the facility the background investigation results?

These are all issues that are going to have to be ironed out before chemical facilities start submitting their site security plans later this year.

About the Author: Patrick J. Coyle has 15 years experience with the US Army, including a stint as a Physical Security NCO in Europe. He has also spent 12 years working as a Process Chemist is a specialty chemical manufacturing company.

Further information about the new regulations concerning protecting chemical plants from terrorist attack can be found at http://www.members.aol.com/ChemPlantSec/ChemPlantSecurity.htm